Kids Online: What California's Design Rules Mean for Your Children's Data

Michael Benavides • July 16, 2026

What California's Age-Appropriate Design rules mean for your children's data.

The game is free because your child is the payment. California decided that wasn't good enough — and gave parents some ground to stand on.

Ava: Michael, every parent has had this moment — you hand over the tablet, and later you realize the app knew your kid's location, or served ads based on what they typed. Does California actually regulate this?

Michael Benavides, Esq.: It does, on two levels — one federal, one state — and it's worth knowing both, including where the state law currently stands in the courts.

The two layers


Ava: So the law is real but the ground is still shifting.

Michael Benavides, Esq.: Exactly — which is why parents shouldn't wait on the courts to act at home.

What parents can do today


Ava: The through-line for Pink Data keeps being: you have more say than they let on.

Michael Benavides, Esq.: And with children, the law gives parents that say on purpose.

Next in Pink Data → Secret Recordings: California's two-party-consent rule, in plain English.


Pink Data helps California families take back control of their data — including their children's. If a company or app is collecting your child's information in a way that concerns you, we can help you assert your rights. Free, confidential consultation: 707-362-4166.

PINK DATA is a women's- and family-focused brand of the Law Office of Michael Benavides, Esq., California State Bar No. 270714. Ava is an editorial brand voice, not an attorney; all legal analysis is provided by Michael Benavides, Esq. General information about California law, not legal advice; no attorney-client relationship is formed. The Age-Appropriate Design Code has been the subject of active litigation — verify the current status of the law before relying on it. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING.

By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 A Community Care Licensing Type A citation flags a serious resident-safety violation — here is the correction and appeal path for RCFE operators.
By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 Facilities can't evict an elder or “dump” them at a hospital to dodge care — there are notice and readmission rights.
By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 California's elder- and dependent-adult restraining order can stop an abuser — including a caregiver or family member — fast.
By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 Missed meals, missed water, and missed or wrong medications are quiet, dangerous forms of neglect that show up in the record.
By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 Sudden weight loss, withdrawal, unexplained bruising — what to watch for, and how APS and mandatory reporting fit in.
By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 Unassisted falls, missing bed alarms, and ignored fall-risk plans — California facilities have a duty to plan for known risks.
By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 Money moved without authority, forged checks, coerced “gifts” — California treats financial elder abuse as its own actionable wrong.
By Michael Benavides July 17, 2026
 In California, a preventable pressure ulcer can be neglect under Welf. & Inst. Code § 15610.57 — with enhanced remedies.
By Michael Benavides July 16, 2026
Nursing-home and RCFE neglect and abuse, pursued under California's elder-protection statutes.
By Michael Benavides July 16, 2026
 California's new account-deletion and breach rules, finally on your side.
Show More