The Look-Back Started From Zero — and It Is Narrower Than Most People Think

Michael Benavides • July 21, 2026

This is a subtitle for your new post

QIM 33  |  Part 2 of 5  |  Elder Law & Medi-Cal Planning

Three separate thresholds have to be crossed before a transfer costs you anything.

A conversation between Ava and Michael

Ava: There is a 30-month look-back now. Does Medi-Cal review two and a half years of my mother's finances?

Michael Benavides, Esq.: Not yet, and there are three filters before any of it bites. First, timing. DHCS is explicit: transfers before January 1, 2026 are not counted. CANHR cites DHCS letter MEDIL I25-23 confirming transfers from January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025 are excluded outright.

Ava: So the clock started at zero and has been filling since.

Michael Benavides, Esq.: Exactly. It grows one month per month toward the full 30. A gift made in 2019, or 2023, or December 2025 is permanently outside the window, no matter the size.

Ava: What is the second filter?

Michael Benavides, Esq.: Who it applies to. CANHR states that transfer penalties can only be applied to those entering a nursing home on Medi-Cal, and not to applicants or beneficiaries living in the community.

Ava: Michael, I have read two official-sounding sources that do not quite agree. DHCS's page says giving assets away could delay coverage if you live in a nursing home or may need long-term care in the future. CANHR says nursing home entrants only. Those are not the same sentence.

Michael Benavides, Esq.: They are not, and you are right to flag it. DHCS's consumer page is written broadly; CANHR reads the underlying policy letters and states the narrower rule. The narrow reading is better supported, but if your parent is heading for a board-and-care or an RCFE rather than a skilled nursing facility, do not assume you are outside the rule on the strength of a blog post. Put that question to your county in writing.

Ava: This is a complicated matter and I would rather we say 'unsettled' than sound certain and be wrong.

Michael Benavides, Esq.: Agreed. The third filter is amount. CANHR gives two examples. Someone with $125,000 who transfers $100,000 gets no penalty — never over the $130,000 limit. And Carmen, with $142,000, transfers $12,000 to get under the limit — no penalty, the transfer is below the Average Private Pay Rate.

Ava: So small transfers by people near the limit are not the target.

Michael Benavides, Esq.: Correct. The rule aims at large gifts by people well over the limit entering a nursing home. CANHR's penalty example: David has $150,000, gifts $20,000 in August 2026, applies in September from a nursing home. $20,000 divided by the APPR gives 1.5 months; California does not count partial months, so he is ineligible one month and eligible again September 1.

Ava: What is the APPR, and can we state it confidently?

Michael Benavides, Esq.: Not quite. The figure is $14,440 per month, but CANHR's fact sheet labels it 2025 in one line and 2026 a paragraph later. The dollar amount is consistent; the year label is not. DHCS republishes it annually. Confirm the current APPR with DHCS or your county before relying on it.

Disclaimer

Attorney advertising. General information about California law, not legal advice; reading it creates no attorney-client relationship. Medi-Cal eligibility is highly fact-specific, published figures are updated periodically, and some points in this series are expressly identified as unsettled. Confirm current rules with DHCS or your county Medi-Cal office before acting. Michael Benavides, Esq. — California State Bar No. 270714. Ava Benavides is an editorial brand voice, not an attorney, and does not provide legal analysis.

Law Desk — surviving a motion to dismiss in California probate and why an evidentiary hearing matters.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
When a court refuses to dismiss and sets an evidentiary hearing, factual disputes exist. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. on why that beats a clean refiling in many cases.
Law Desk — a large late-in-life transfer to a caregiver or drafter can trigger a presumption of undue influence in California.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
A large transfer late in life to a caregiver or the person who drafted the document can trigger a presumption of undue influence. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. on the California rules.
Law Desk — California Probate Code 16460 statute of limitations for breach of trust and the delayed-discovery rule.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
California gives three years to sue for breach of trust, but when the clock starts depends on what the trustee disclosed. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. explain Section 16460.
Law Desk — a trustee who claims the trust is unfunded still owes a duty to account in California.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
A trustee who says the trust holds no assets still owes a duty to account under Probate Code 16062. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. on compelling an accounting and Section 850.
Law Desk — in California an amended petition supersedes the original pleading.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
In California an amended petition replaces the original; the first pleading becomes a nullity. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. on the trap that catches self-represented litigants.
Law Desk — California Medi-Cal: exempt transfers, spend-down, and what not to do.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
The moves that are genuinely permitted under California Medi-Cal — exempt transfers and spend-down — plus a correction to a common myth. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq.
Law Desk — will Medi-Cal take the house in California? Estate recovery reaches only the probate estate.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
California Medi-Cal estate recovery reaches only the probate estate, and one state waiver is broader than federal law requires. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. explain.
Law Desk — a California revocable living trust is estate planning, not Medi-Cal asset protection.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
A revocable living trust does one job extremely well and a different job not at all. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. on why it is not Medi-Cal armor.
Law Desk — California Medi-Cal long-term care asset protection: the 2026 look-back and asset-limit changes.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
California Medi-Cal in 2026: the asset limit returned and a 30-month look-back is phasing in. Ava and Michael Benavides, Esq. break down what changed for long-term care planning.
Caffeine Law bankruptcy Q&A hero — Meeting Your Trustee: local practice and the 341 meeting in the Eastern District of California.
By Michael Benavides July 21, 2026
Meeting Your Trustee: Local Practice in the Eastern District — Sacramento, Stockton & Modesto CA bankruptcy Q&A. Free consult 707-362-4166.
Show More